Literature

Anderson, M. C. 2005. The Role of Inhibitory Control in Forgetting Unwanted Memories: A Consideration of Three Methods. In Dynamic Cognitive Processes, edited by C. MacLeod & B. Uttl. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 159–90.

Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. 1994. Remembering Can Cause Forgetting: Retrieval Dynamics in Long-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1036–87.

Augé, M. 2004. Oblivion. Translated from the French by M. de Jager. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 56–57 ff.

–. 2009. Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity. Translated from the French by J. Howe. London: Verso Books.

Bengtsson, S. L., Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Ullén, F. 2007. Cortical Regions Involved in the Generation of Musical Structures during Improvisation in Pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, no. 5, 830–42.

Carroll, N. 1992. Art, Intention, and Conversation. In Intention and Interpretation, edited by G. Iseminger. Philadelphia: Temple, 97–131.

Conway, M. A. 2005. Memory and the Self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.

Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. 2000. The Construction of Autobiographical Memories in the Self-Memory System. Psychological Review, 107, 261–88.

Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. 2004. The Self and Autobiographical  Memory: Correspondence and Coherence. Social Cognition, 22, 491–529.

Dalfen, A. K., & Feinstein, A. 2000. Head Injury, Dissociation, and the Ganser Syndrome. Brain Injury, 14, 1101–05.

Dean, R. T. & Bailes, F. 2016. Cognitive Processes in Musical Improvisation. In The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies: Volume 1, edited by G. E. Lewis and B. Piekut. New York: Oxford University Press, 45.

Dudai, Y. 2006. Reconsolidation: The Advantage of Being Refocused. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 174–78.

Entzenberg, C. 2005. Contextualisation Occurs, But There Is No Context. In Perspectives on Aesthetics, Art and Culture, Essays in Honour of Lars-Olof Ålberg, edited by C. Entzenberg & S. Säätelä. Stockholm: Thales, 125–37.

Faber, S. & McIntosh, A. R. 2019. Towards a Standard Model of Improvisation. Toronto: Rothman Research Institute.

Frisk, H., & Karlsson, H. 2011. Time and Interaction: Research Through Non-Visual Arts and Media. In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, edited by H. Frisk & H. Karlsson. London: Routledge, 277–92.

Hansson Wahlberg, T. 2013. Dissolving Mctaggart’s Paradox. In Johanssonian Investigations, edited by C. Svennerlind et al. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 240–58.

Iyer, V. S. 2008. On Improvisation, Temporality, and Embodied Experience. In Sound Unbound: sampling digital music and culture, edited by P. D. Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press, 273–92.

Izquierdo, I. 2015. The Art of Forgetting. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 14–25.

Jutterström, J., Larsson, A. H., & Lindal, A. Ongoing. Lethe. Artistic research project funded by the Swedish Research Council. Stockholm: Stockholm University of the Arts.
Larsson, A. H. 2020. An Alternative Interpretive Model of Non-Linguistic Performative Acts. In Seduced by (a) last year: Interdisciplinary Music Motivated by Non-Idiomatic Improvisation, The Non-Productive Attitude, and Pluralist Aesthetics. Master’s thesis in jazz and improvised music. Stockholm: Royal College of Music, 51–58.

López Cano, R. 2006. What Kind of Affordances are Musical Affordances? A Semiotic Approach. Paper presented at L’Ascolto Musicale: Condotte, Pratiche, Grammatiche. Terzo Simposio Internazionale sulle Scienze del Linguaggio Musicale. Bologna, Italy.

Lewis, E. 2019. Intents and Purposes: Philosophy and the Aesthetics of Improvisation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Markowitsch, H. J. 1992. Intellectual Functions and the Brain. An Historical Perspective. Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.

Pollock, D. 1998. Performative Writing. In The Ends of Performance, edited by P. Phelan & J. Lane. New York: New York University Press, 73–103.

Sara, S. J. 2008. Consolidation: From Hypothesis to Paradigm to Concept. In Science of memory: Concepts, edited by H. L. Roediger, Y. Dudai, & S.M. Fitzpatrick. New York: Oxford University Press, 183–89.

Smithers, T. 1996. On What Embodiment Might Have to do with Cognition, AAAI. Online <http://www.aaai.org/Papers/
Symposia/Fall/1996/FS-96-02/FS96-02-024.pdf> (accessed on 13 February 2010).

– .1998. In Time and Over Time. In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5), 651–52.






















In contemporary civilization where everything is standardized and where everything is repeated, the whole point is to forget in the space between an object and its duplication. If we didn't have this power of forgetfulness, if art today didn't help us to forget, we would be submerged, drowned under those avalanches of rigorously identical objects (For the Birds, 1981).  -John Cage